In the previous entry I suggested that the Tang Dynasty administrator, Gao Pian, may have been responsible for transforming a local spirit into the spirit of an historical figure, Cao Lỗ. While I was guessing that this is what might have happened, the case of the spirit of Lý Ông Trọng suggests this much more clearly.

This is what the Đại Việt sử ký toàn thư records about Lý Ông Trọng (the same information appears in a bit more detail in the Việt điện u linh tập).

秦併六國,稱皇帝。時我交趾慈廉人李翁仲,身長二丈三尺。少時往郷吧供力役,為長官所笞。遂入仕秦,至司隷校尉。始皇得天下,使將兵守臨洮,聲振匈奴,及老歸田里卒。始皇以為異,鑄銅為像,置咸陽司馬門,腹中容數十人,濳搖動之,匈奴以為生校尉,不敢犯(唐趙昌為交州都護,常夜夢與翁仲講《春秋左氏傳》。因訪其故宅,在焉。立祠致祭,迨高王破南詔,常顯應助順。高王重修祠字,彫木立像,號李校尉。其神祠在慈廉縣瑞香社)。

The [King of] Qin annexed six kingdoms and declared himself August Emperor. At that time, Lý Ông Trọng, a man from Từ Liêm [District] in Our Giao Chỉ/Jiaozhi was two trượng and three thước tall. When he was still young he went to a town to labor. He was flogged by a senior official and then went to serve the Qin, where he was eventually promoted to metropolitan commandant. When the First Emperor obtained All Under Heaven, he had [Lý Ông Trọng] lead troops to garrison Lintao and awe the Xiongnu. When [Lý Ông Trọng] became old, he returned to his village and died. The First Emperor found him to be an extraordinary man. He had [Lý Ông Trọng’s] image cast in bronze and placed at the Outer Palace Gate in Xianyang. It could hold several tens of men, who would secretly rock it back and forth. The Xiongnu believed that it was the living commandant, and dared not trespass.

During the Tang, Protector-General of Giao Region Zhao Chang would often dream at night of talking with Ông Trọng about the Spring and Autumn Annals and Master Zuo’s Commentary. He then visited [Lý Ông Trọng’s] old residence and found that it was there. He had a shrine set up and made an offering. Later, at the time when King Gao [i.e., Gao Pian] defeated Nanzhao, [Lý Ông Trọng’s spirit] often responded by assisting with the submission [of rebels]. King Gao had the shrine renovated, and an image carved in wood and erected there, which he called Commandant Lý. His spirit shrine is in Thụy Hương Community, Từ Liêm District.

Analysis

Does it seem strange that someone from the area of the Red River delta would go all the way off to fight the Xiongnu, a nomadic people who lived to the north of what is today China? Of course it is strange, because it is not true. Instead, this is a Chinese legend which Zhao Chang probably “imported” into the region.

There are a few references in early Chinese historical records about the Qin emperor casting huge bronze statues. From these few references many different concepts or traditions developed. For one, statues placed outside of graves came to be called “Ông Trọng/Wengzhong.” Second, a legend about “Ông Trọng/Wengzhong” developed, only he was not surnamed Lý, but Ruan.

During the period of the Ming Dynasty, Peng Dayi 彭大翼 (1552-1643) recorded the following story about Ruan Wengzhong in his encyclopedia, Reckless Investigations from a Mountain Hall (山堂肆考, Shantang sikao, 149/1b):

翁仲姓阮,身长一丈二尺。少為縣吏,為督郵所笞,嘆曰:人當如是耶。遂入学究書史。秦始皇倂天下,使翁仲将兵守臨洮,聲振匈奴,秦人以為瑞。翁仲死,遂鑄铜像置咸陽司馬門外。

“Wengzhong’s surname was Ruan. He was one trượng and two thước tall. When he was young, he was a low-level district official and was flogged by a local inspector. He exclaimed, ‘Does one have to be like this?’ He then devoted himself to study. When the First Emperor of the Qin annexed All Under Heaven, he had Wengzhong lead troops to garrison Lintao and awe the Xiongnu. The people of the Qin found him to be auspicious. After Wengzhong died, a bronze image was cast and placed outside the Outer Palace Gate in Xianyang.”

Not only is the content here similar, some of the wording is identical as well. Coming from a Ming encyclopedia, this passage must have originated in earlier texts. This is a legend which had probably long been in circulation.

That is then what makes the information in the Đại Việt sử ký toàn thư about Zhao Chang so fascinating. Did Zhao Chang really dream about Ông Trọng/Wengzhong? The story in the Đại Việt sử ký toàn thư does not say anything about Ông Trọng/Wengzhong being educated. This Chinese version, however, makes it clear why Ông Trọng/Wengzhong would have been able to talk about the Spring and Autumn Annals and Master Zuo’s Commentary, as he had “devoted himself to study” for a period of time. So perhaps Zhao Chang did actually dream about him.

Why, however, would Zhao Chang have felt that Ông Trọng’s/Wengzhong’s old residence was in the area? There does not appear to be anything in this legend to suggest that. This is where I think the idea that Chinese administrators might have created some cults in the region makes sense.

This passage makes me wonder if perhaps it was the case that Zhao Chang built a shrine to Ông Trọng/Wengzhong at a place where some other spirit was already being worshipped. This was a very common practice across the Chinese world at the time. Local officials would take over a “heterodox” shrine and get the people to worship in its place an “orthodox” spirit, which was usually an upright historical figure. Perhaps this is what Zhao Chang did. He used the figure of Ông Trọng/Wengzhong, about whom perhaps he had dreamed (we can’t say for sure), and created a new shrine for him to get people to turn away from the worship of a “heterodox” spirit.

As for Gao Pian, did Ông Trọng’s/Wengzhong’s spirit really assist him? Or was this a story which Gao Pian told in order to get people to believe in the power of a spirit which supported Gao Pian, and to thereby get the people to support Gao Pian as well?

Whatever conclusions people draw about all of this, the one point which is clear is that Lý Ông Trọng was not originally “Vietnamese.” His status as a “Vietnamese” spirit and a figure of “Vietnamese” history is clearly an invention.

Share This Post

Leave a comment

This Post Has 4 Comments

  1. nguyensau

    Your idea and analysis that Zhao Chang might have created the spirit and shine of Ly Ong Trong which was later mentioned in DVSKTT makes sense to me. I like this entry because it opens a lot of questions, but it has troubled me at the same time because of these and those questions.
    For example, in saying the Ming text should originate from earlier texts, have you found out or thought of any kind of earlier texts like them? I see you wanted to refer what you above mentioned as “a few references in early Chinese historical records about the Qin emperor casting huge bronze statues.” Is it that case?
    This is what I don’t really get its sense as you make a point that the information of how Wengzhong was educated in Chinese version can make it clear why he could discuss Chunjin Zuo shi zhuan, the information which is said in DVSKTT. Or is it the fact that there is similar info of Chunjiu Zuo shi zhuan which is also mentioned in Chinese earlier texts?
    Also, Zhao Chang is a Tang officials. Then is there any reference of him and his relation with Ly/Ruan Ong Trong in Chinese records or at some else?

  2. Hoa Quoc Van

    “In the previous entry I suggested that the Tang Dynasty administrator, Gao Pian, may have been responsible for transforming a local spirit into the spirit of an historical figure, Cao Lỗ”. What’s the “previous entry” did you refer to? Could you help me saving my time! Thank you a lot, Prof!

  3. leminhkhai

    I can’t find it either. I have no idea where it went. . .

  4. Quang Nguyen

    Constructing Local Narratives: Spirits, Dreams, and Prophecies in the Medieval Red River Delta
    Liam C. Kelley

    … In other accounts about Gao Pian’s encounters with spirits, there is more evidence to suggest that stories were created at that time to support Gao’s ef- forts to pacify the region. We can see some evidence of this, for instance, in the case of the spirit of Cao Lỗ. Cao Lỗ is a person mentioned in what is arguably the earliest source to record information about the Red River delta, the Record of the Outer Territory of Jiao Region (JiaoZHOU waiyu ji). This Chinese work from either the late third or early fourth century CE is no longer extant, but passages from it are cited in later works, such as Li Daoyuan’s sixth-century Annotated Classic of Waterways (Shuijing ZHU). The Record of the Outer Territory of Jiao Region recorded that prior to the period of Chinese control in the region, it had been ruled by Lạc kings who were served by Lạc marquises and Lạc generals. In the third century BCE, they were defeated by a man known as King An Dương. The text then records that King An Dương had in his service a divine person (yiren). In the Record of the Outer Territory of Jiao Region, his name is recorded as Cao Thông; however, in some medieval Vietnamese sources he came to be referred to as Cao Lỗ.22 … ( page 88 )

Leave a Reply