Going Backwards

Going Backwards: A Series

In 2017 historian Ben Kiernan published a survey of Vietnamese history with Oxford University Press called Viet Nam: A History From Earliest Times to the Present.

Prior to the publication of this text, historians Keith Taylor and Christopher Goscha each published a survey of Vietnamese history. Both of these historians are experts on Vietnamese history. While one can find points to critique in each of these books, on the whole they are solid works that advance our knowledge of Vietnamese history.

Kiernan, by contrast, is not an expert on Vietnam. When he wrote his book he had the equivalent of one year of classroom Vietnamese language study and no knowledge of classical Chinese. And yet, for some reason he decided to write a book that devotes hundreds of pages to premodern Vietnamese history.

Needless to say, I found a lot to criticize in this book. So I did, and the posts below contain those critiques.

There are undoubtedly people who wonder why I chose to do this. The reason is very simple.

  1. Very  few people can evaluate scholarship on premodern Vietnamese history.
  2. The standard 800-word book review format is not sufficient for demonstrating the seriousness of the flaws in this book.
  3. I knew that there would be scholars who would simply opt to remain silent.

There is a lot of politeness and diplomacy in academia. And there is a lot of mediocrity too.

The posts below may at times not be as polite or diplomatic as they could be, but I did my best to not be mediocre.

Who Were the Yue?

In her Ancient China and the Yue: Perceptions and Identities on the Southern Frontier, c. 400 BC-50 CE, historian Erica Brindley opens the book with

Read More »